WallStSmart

Aecom Technology Corporation (ACM)vsMasTec Inc (MTZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Aecom Technology Corporation generates 12% more annual revenue ($15.96B vs $14.30B). ACM leads profitability with a 2.9% profit margin vs 2.8%. ACM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.98. MTZ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

ACM

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.73

MTZ

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.5Value: 5.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.59
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ACMSignificantly Overvalued (-228.1%)

Margin of Safety

-228.1%

Fair Value

$30.74

Current Price

$88.54

$57.80 premium

UndervaluedFair: $30.74Overvalued
MTZOvervalued (-7.7%)

Margin of Safety

-7.7%

Fair Value

$246.17

Current Price

$323.55

$77.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $246.17Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ACM2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
28.2%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 28 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.988/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

MTZ2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
92.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 92.8% YoY

Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.8%8/10

15.8% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

ACM4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.734/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.443/10

Elevated debt levels

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.6%2/10

Revenue declined 4.6%

MTZ3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.964/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
2.8%3/10

2.8% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
61.3x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ACM

The strongest argument for ACM centers on Return on Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.98 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MTZ

The strongest argument for MTZ centers on EPS Growth, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 15.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ACM

The primary concerns for ACM are Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : MTZ

The primary concerns for MTZ are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 61.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ACM profiles as a value stock while MTZ is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MTZ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.89 — expect wider price swings.

MTZ is growing revenue faster at 15.8% — sustainability is the question.

MTZ generates stronger free cash flow (214M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MTZ scores higher overall (58/100 vs 53/100) and 15.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Aecom Technology Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

AECOM provides professional construction and program management services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.

Visit Website →

MasTec Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

MasTec, Inc., an infrastructure construction company, provides engineering, construction, installation, maintenance, and upgrade services for communications, energy, utilities, and other infrastructure primarily in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?