WallStSmart

Albertsons Companies (ACI)vsProcter & Gamble Company (PG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Procter & Gamble Company generates 4% more annual revenue ($86.72B vs $83.17B). PG leads profitability with a 19.2% profit margin vs 0.3%. ACI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.36. PG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

ACI

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.26

PG

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.01
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ACIFair Value (-5.0%)

Margin of Safety

-5.0%

Fair Value

$16.89

Current Price

$16.36

$0.53 premium

UndervaluedFair: $16.89Overvalued
PGSignificantly Overvalued (-53.8%)

Margin of Safety

-53.8%

Fair Value

$99.13

Current Price

$146.54

$47.41 premium

UndervaluedFair: $99.13Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ACI1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.2610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PG5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$350.36B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
30.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.0110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Operating MarginProfitability
23.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.03B8/10

Generating 3.0B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

ACI4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
38.5x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Profit MarginProfitability
0.3%3/10

0.3% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.7%3/10

Operating margin of 1.7%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PG1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.202/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ACI

The strongest argument for ACI centers on Altman Z-Score. PEG of 1.36 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : PG

The strongest argument for PG centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.2% and operating margin at 23.1%.

Bear Case : ACI

The primary concerns for ACI are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 8.33 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 0.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : PG

The primary concerns for PG are PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ACI profiles as a value stock while PG is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

PG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.39 — expect wider price swings.

ACI is growing revenue faster at 7.7% — sustainability is the question.

PG generates stronger free cash flow (3.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PG scores higher overall (59/100 vs 48/100), backed by strong 19.2% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Albertsons Companies

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · GROCERY STORES · USA

Albertsons Companies, Inc. participates in the pharmacy and food operation in the United States.

Visit Website →

Procter & Gamble Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, founded in 1837 by William Procter and James Gamble. It specializes in a wide range of personal health, consumer health, personal care, and hygiene products; these products are organized into several segments including Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine, & Family Care. Before the sale of Pringles to Kellogg's, its product portfolio also included food, snacks, and beverages.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?