WallStSmart

Arch Capital Group Ltd. (ACGL)vsNu Holdings Ltd (NU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Arch Capital Group Ltd. generates 128% more annual revenue ($19.23B vs $8.44B). NU leads profitability with a 42.7% profit margin vs 24.4%. NU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.71. NU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 79/100 (B+).

ACGL

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 7.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.48

NU

Strong Buy

79

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 10.0Profit: 9.0Value: 6.3Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.22

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ACGL6 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
24.4%9/10

Keeps 24 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.189/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Operating MarginProfitability
26.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.31B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

NU6 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
42.7%10/10

Keeps 43 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
50.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 50.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
52.1%10/10

Revenue surging 52.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
66.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 66.3% YoY

Market CapQuality
$74.25B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
27.2%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 27 in profit

Areas to Watch

ACGL3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
-10.5%2/10

Revenue declined 10.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-7.1%2/10

Earnings declined 7.1%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.482/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

NU4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-2.93B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.222/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
3.171/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ACGL

The strongest argument for ACGL centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 24.4% and operating margin at 26.6%. PEG of 1.06 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : NU

The strongest argument for NU centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 42.7% and operating margin at 50.1%. Revenue growth of 52.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ACGL

The primary concerns for ACGL are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : NU

The primary concerns for NU are Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 3.17 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ACGL profiles as a declining stock while NU is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

NU carries more volatility with a beta of 0.94 — expect wider price swings.

NU is growing revenue faster at 52.1% — sustainability is the question.

ACGL generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

NU scores higher overall (79/100 vs 67/100), backed by strong 42.7% margins and 52.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Arch Capital Group Ltd.

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Arch Capital Group Ltd., offers insurance, reinsurance and mortgage products worldwide. The company is headquartered in Pembroke, Bermuda.

Nu Holdings Ltd

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - REGIONAL · USA

Nu Holdings Ltd. operates in the technology industry. The company is headquartered in Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?