WallStSmart

Accel Entertainment Inc (ACEL)vsFlutter Entertainment plc (FLUT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Flutter Entertainment plc generates 1134% more annual revenue ($17.16B vs $1.39B). ACEL leads profitability with a 4.1% profit margin vs -4.4%. ACEL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

ACEL

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.15

FLUT

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.29
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ACELUndervalued (+24.1%)

Margin of Safety

+24.1%

Fair Value

$14.62

Current Price

$11.60

$3.02 discount

UndervaluedFair: $14.62Overvalued
FLUTSignificantly Overvalued (-27.2%)

Margin of Safety

-27.2%

Fair Value

$113.45

Current Price

$100.56

$12.89 premium

UndervaluedFair: $113.45Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ACEL2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
17.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

FLUT2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1910/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ACEL3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$938.46M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
4.1%3/10

4.1% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
2.021/10

Elevated debt levels

FLUT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.3%4/10

3.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.443/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-9.1%2/10

ROE of -9.1% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ACEL

The strongest argument for ACEL centers on EPS Growth, P/E Ratio.

Bull Case : FLUT

The strongest argument for FLUT centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.19 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ACEL

The primary concerns for ACEL are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.02 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : FLUT

The primary concerns for FLUT are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ACEL profiles as a value stock while FLUT is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

FLUT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.07 — expect wider price swings.

ACEL is growing revenue faster at 9.6% — sustainability is the question.

FLUT generates stronger free cash flow (189M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ACEL scores higher overall (56/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Accel Entertainment Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · GAMBLING · USA

Accel Entertainment, Inc., is a distributed games operator in the United States. The company is headquartered in Burr Ridge, Illinois.

Flutter Entertainment plc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · GAMBLING · USA

Flutter Entertainment plc is a sports betting and gaming company in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, the United States, Italy, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Dublin, Ireland.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?