WallStSmart

Arcosa Inc (ACA)vsQuanta Services Inc (PWR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Quanta Services Inc generates 1027% more annual revenue ($32.91B vs $2.92B). ACA leads profitability with a 16.8% profit margin vs 4.0%. PWR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.40. PWR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

ACA

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 6.5Value: 4.3Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.95

PWR

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 5.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 2.13

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ACA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
448.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 448.6% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PWR3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
41.1%10/10

Revenue surging 41.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
94.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 94.7% YoY

Market CapQuality
$97.81B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

ACA4 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.854/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
32.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.7%4/10

1.7% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.954/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

PWR4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Price/BookValuation
10.1x4/10

Trading at 10.1x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
74.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ACA

The strongest argument for ACA centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.8% and operating margin at 12.3%.

Bull Case : PWR

The strongest argument for PWR centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 41.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.40 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ACA

The primary concerns for ACA are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : PWR

The primary concerns for PWR are Price/Book, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 74.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ACA profiles as a value stock while PWR is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

PWR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

PWR is growing revenue faster at 41.1% — sustainability is the question.

PWR generates stronger free cash flow (864M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PWR scores higher overall (63/100 vs 61/100) and 41.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Arcosa Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Arcosa, Inc. provides infrastructure related products and solutions for the construction, energy and transportation markets in North America. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

Quanta Services Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Quanta Services is an American corporation that provides infrastructure services for electric power, pipeline, industrial and communications industries. Capabilities include the planning, design, installation, program management, maintenance and repair of most types of network infrastructure.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?