WallStSmart

Arcosa Inc (ACA)vsQuanta Services Inc (PWR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Quanta Services Inc generates 888% more annual revenue ($28.48B vs $2.88B). ACA leads profitability with a 7.2% profit margin vs 3.6%. ACA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.38. ACA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

ACA

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 10.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.73

PWR

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ACAUndervalued (+35.6%)

Margin of Safety

+35.6%

Fair Value

$198.43

Current Price

$106.72

$91.71 discount

UndervaluedFair: $198.43Overvalued
PWRSignificantly Overvalued (-602.0%)

Margin of Safety

-602.0%

Fair Value

$74.64

Current Price

$573.50

$498.86 premium

UndervaluedFair: $74.64Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ACA1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PWR2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$84.90B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
19.7%8/10

19.7% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

ACA4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
3.4%4/10

3.4% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.734/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
7.2%3/10

7.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PWR4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.824/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
9.6x4/10

Trading at 9.6x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
2.6%4/10

2.6% earnings growth

Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ACA

The strongest argument for ACA centers on Price/Book. PEG of 1.38 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : PWR

The strongest argument for PWR centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 19.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ACA

The primary concerns for ACA are EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : PWR

The primary concerns for PWR are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. A P/E of 83.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ACA profiles as a value stock while PWR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

PWR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.11 — expect wider price swings.

PWR is growing revenue faster at 19.7% — sustainability is the question.

PWR generates stronger free cash flow (934M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ACA scores higher overall (64/100 vs 47/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Arcosa Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Arcosa, Inc. provides infrastructure related products and solutions for the construction, energy and transportation markets in North America. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

Quanta Services Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Quanta Services is an American corporation that provides infrastructure services for electric power, pipeline, industrial and communications industries. Capabilities include the planning, design, installation, program management, maintenance and repair of most types of network infrastructure.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?