WallStSmart

Abbott Laboratories (ABT)vsUnilever PLC ADR (UL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Unilever PLC ADR generates 14% more annual revenue ($50.50B vs $44.33B). UL leads profitability with a 18.8% profit margin vs 14.7%. ABT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.52. ABT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

ABT

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9

UL

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ABTSignificantly Overvalued (-315.5%)

Margin of Safety

-315.5%

Fair Value

$25.23

Current Price

$104.83

$79.60 premium

UndervaluedFair: $25.23Overvalued
ULSignificantly Overvalued (-268.2%)

Margin of Safety

-268.2%

Fair Value

$20.26

Current Price

$60.80

$40.54 premium

UndervaluedFair: $20.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ABT3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$180.82B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
21.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.63B8/10

Generating 2.6B in free cash flow

UL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
31.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Market CapQuality
$132.46B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.48B8/10

Generating 5.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

ABT4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.4%4/10

4.4% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

UL3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.914/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.4%2/10

Earnings declined 3.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ABT

The strongest argument for ABT centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : UL

The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.8% and operating margin at 20.1%.

Bear Case : ABT

The primary concerns for ABT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : UL

The primary concerns for UL are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ABT profiles as a value stock while UL is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

ABT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.74 — expect wider price swings.

ABT is growing revenue faster at 4.4% — sustainability is the question.

UL generates stronger free cash flow (5.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ABT scores higher overall (51/100 vs 50/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Abbott Laboratories

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Abbott Laboratories is an American multinational medical devices and health care company with headquarters in Abbott Park, Illinois, United States. The company was founded by Chicago physician Wallace Calvin Abbott in 1888 to formulate known drugs; today, it sells medical devices, diagnostics, branded generic medicines and nutritional products. It split off its research-based pharmaceuticals business into AbbVie in 2013.

Visit Website →

Unilever PLC ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?