WallStSmart

ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM)vsCintas Corporation (CTAS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cintas Corporation generates 22% more annual revenue ($10.79B vs $8.87B). CTAS leads profitability with a 17.6% profit margin vs 1.8%. ABM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.25. CTAS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

ABM

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.57

CTAS

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 9.0Value: 4.7Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 4.29
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ABMSignificantly Overvalued (-170.7%)

Margin of Safety

-170.7%

Fair Value

$17.27

Current Price

$38.52

$21.25 premium

UndervaluedFair: $17.27Overvalued
CTASSignificantly Overvalued (-78.1%)

Margin of Safety

-78.1%

Fair Value

$112.48

Current Price

$176.85

$64.37 premium

UndervaluedFair: $112.48Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ABM2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
14.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

CTAS4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
43.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 43 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.2910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Market CapQuality
$70.75B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
23.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 23.4%

Areas to Watch

ABM4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.254/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
1.8%3/10

1.8% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.5%3/10

Operating margin of 3.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-7.2%2/10

Earnings declined 7.2%

CTAS3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
38.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
15.2x4/10

Trading at 15.2x book value

PEG RatioValuation
2.922/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ABM

The strongest argument for ABM centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio.

Bull Case : CTAS

The strongest argument for CTAS centers on Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.6% and operating margin at 23.4%.

Bear Case : ABM

The primary concerns for ABM are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 1.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : CTAS

The primary concerns for CTAS are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ABM profiles as a value stock while CTAS is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

CTAS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.94 — expect wider price swings.

CTAS is growing revenue faster at 9.3% — sustainability is the question.

CTAS generates stronger free cash flow (425M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CTAS scores higher overall (60/100 vs 49/100), backed by strong 17.6% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

ABM Industries Incorporated

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

ABM Industries Incorporated provides integrated facility solutions in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Visit Website →

Cintas Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?