WallStSmart

Ambev SA ADR (ABEV)vsNokia Corp ADR (NOK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ambev SA ADR generates 341% more annual revenue ($88.21B vs $20.00B). ABEV leads profitability with a 17.7% profit margin vs 4.0%. NOK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.15. ABEV earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

ABEV

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 3.3Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.39

NOK

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 5.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ABEVUndervalued (+74.4%)

Margin of Safety

+74.4%

Fair Value

$11.91

Current Price

$3.29

$8.62 discount

UndervaluedFair: $11.91Overvalued
NOKUndervalued (+16.7%)

Margin of Safety

+16.7%

Fair Value

$8.81

Current Price

$12.35

$3.54 discount

UndervaluedFair: $8.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ABEV5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$11.62B10/10

Generating 11.6B in free cash flow

Market CapQuality
$53.50B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
17.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
26.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.5%

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$74.25B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ABEV3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.314/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
2.2%4/10

2.2% earnings growth

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.1%2/10

Revenue declined 0.1%

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.654/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ABEV

The strongest argument for ABEV centers on Free Cash Flow, Market Cap, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.7% and operating margin at 26.5%.

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.15 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : ABEV

The primary concerns for ABEV are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 83.1x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ABEV profiles as a declining stock while NOK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

NOK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.77 — expect wider price swings.

NOK is growing revenue faster at 2.4% — sustainability is the question.

ABEV generates stronger free cash flow (11.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ABEV scores higher overall (57/100 vs 40/100), backed by strong 17.7% margins. NOK offers better value entry with a 16.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ambev SA ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - BREWERS · USA

Ambev SA produces, distributes and sells beer, draft beer, carbonated soft drinks (CSD), other non-alcoholic beverages, malt and food products in the Americas. The company is headquartered in So Paulo, Brazil.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?