WallStSmart

Nokia Corp ADR (NOK)vsConstellation Brands Inc Class A (STZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nokia Corp ADR generates 112% more annual revenue ($19.89B vs $9.38B). STZ leads profitability with a 11.8% profit margin vs 3.3%. NOK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.83. STZ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

NOK

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.60

STZ

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.61
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NOKSignificantly Overvalued (-734.1%)

Margin of Safety

-734.1%

Fair Value

$0.88

Current Price

$8.41

$7.53 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.88Overvalued
STZSignificantly Overvalued (-276.7%)

Margin of Safety

-276.7%

Fair Value

$43.32

Current Price

$151.56

$108.24 premium

UndervaluedFair: $43.32Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.838/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

STZ1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.9%

Areas to Watch

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.604/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.3%3/10

3.3% margin — thin

STZ4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.614/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.383/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
5.462/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-9.8%2/10

Revenue declined 9.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.83 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : STZ

The strongest argument for STZ centers on Operating Margin.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 63.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : STZ

The primary concerns for STZ are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NOK profiles as a value stock while STZ is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

NOK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.61 — expect wider price swings.

NOK is growing revenue faster at 2.4% — sustainability is the question.

STZ generates stronger free cash flow (371M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

STZ scores higher overall (50/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Constellation Brands Inc Class A

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - BREWERS · USA

Constellation Brands, Inc., headquartered in Victor, New York, is an American producer and marketer of beer, wine, and spirits.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?