WallStSmart

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Wells Fargo & Company generates 491% more annual revenue ($80.04B vs $13.55B). WFC leads profitability with a 26.7% profit margin vs -1.6%. WFC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.66. WFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

WFC

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 9.0Value: 10.0Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.43

WPP

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.5Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

WFCUndervalued (+54.2%)

Margin of Safety

+54.2%

Fair Value

$173.78

Current Price

$79.61

$94.17 discount

UndervaluedFair: $173.78Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WPP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

WFC6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$243.59B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
26.7%9/10

Keeps 27 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
12.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
29.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.12B8/10

Generating 4.1B in free cash flow

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

WFC2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.664/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.432/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : WFC

The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 26.7% and operating margin at 29.9%.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : WFC

The primary concerns for WFC are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

WFC profiles as a value stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

WFC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.07 — expect wider price swings.

WFC is growing revenue faster at 5.0% — sustainability is the question.

WFC generates stronger free cash flow (4.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WFC scores higher overall (72/100 vs 35/100), backed by strong 26.7% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Wells Fargo & Company

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?