WallStSmart

Waters Corporation (WAT)vsExagen Inc (XGN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waters Corporation generates 4654% more annual revenue ($3.17B vs $66.58M). WAT leads profitability with a 20.3% profit margin vs -30.0%. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

WAT

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 9.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92

XGN

Hold

36

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

WATSignificantly Overvalued (-349.9%)

Margin of Safety

-349.9%

Fair Value

$73.17

Current Price

$302.32

$229.15 premium

UndervaluedFair: $73.17Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for XGN.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

WAT4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
29.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
20.3%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

XGN1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
21.8%8/10

Revenue surging 21.8% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

WAT2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.1%2/10

Earnings declined 3.1%

XGN4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$65.91M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-147.8%2/10

ROE of -147.8% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-3.06M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Operating Margin, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.3% and operating margin at 33.8%. PEG of 1.25 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : XGN

The strongest argument for XGN centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 21.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : XGN

The primary concerns for XGN are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

WAT profiles as a mature stock while XGN is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

XGN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.91 — expect wider price swings.

XGN is growing revenue faster at 21.8% — sustainability is the question.

WAT generates stronger free cash flow (126M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (60/100 vs 36/100), backed by strong 20.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Exagen Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Exagen Inc. develops and markets various test products based on its Cell-Bound Complement Activation Products technology under the AVISE brand name in the United States. The company is headquartered in Vista, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?