WallStSmart

Waters Corporation (WAT)vsW. R. Berkley Corp (WRB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

W. R. Berkley Corp generates 365% more annual revenue ($14.71B vs $3.17B). WAT leads profitability with a 20.3% profit margin vs 12.1%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.25. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

WAT

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 9.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92

WRB

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

WATSignificantly Overvalued (-349.9%)

Margin of Safety

-349.9%

Fair Value

$73.17

Current Price

$302.32

$229.15 premium

UndervaluedFair: $73.17Overvalued
WRBSignificantly Overvalued (-136.4%)

Margin of Safety

-136.4%

Fair Value

$30.26

Current Price

$64.49

$34.23 premium

UndervaluedFair: $30.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

WAT4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
29.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
20.3%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

WRB2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
14.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

WAT2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.1%2/10

Earnings declined 3.1%

WRB4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.5%4/10

1.5% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
10.112/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-21.8%2/10

Earnings declined 21.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Operating Margin, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.3% and operating margin at 33.8%. PEG of 1.25 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WRB

The strongest argument for WRB centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : WRB

The primary concerns for WRB are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

WAT profiles as a mature stock while WRB is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 6.8% — sustainability is the question.

WRB generates stronger free cash flow (896M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (60/100 vs 55/100), backed by strong 20.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

W. R. Berkley Corp

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE - PROPERTY & CASUALTY · USA

W. R. Berkley Corporation is a commercial lines property & casualty insurance holding company organized in Delaware and based in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?