WallStSmart

Trane Technologies plc (TT)vsUber Technologies Inc (UBER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Uber Technologies Inc generates 141% more annual revenue ($52.02B vs $21.60B). UBER leads profitability with a 19.3% profit margin vs 13.4%. TT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.39. UBER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

TT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 4.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9

UBER

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TT.

UBERUndervalued (+32.0%)

Margin of Safety

+32.0%

Fair Value

$104.98

Current Price

$79.17

$25.81 discount

UndervaluedFair: $104.98Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

TT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
36.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Market CapQuality
$107.57B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

UBER5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
Return on EquityProfitability
39.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 40 in profit

Market CapQuality
$152.16B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Revenue GrowthGrowth
20.1%8/10

Revenue surging 20.1% year-over-year

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.81B8/10

Generating 2.8B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

TT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.394/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
37.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
12.6x4/10

Trading at 12.6x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.1%2/10

Earnings declined 2.1%

UBER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : TT

The strongest argument for TT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap.

Bull Case : UBER

The strongest argument for UBER centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.3% and operating margin at 12.3%. Revenue growth of 20.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : TT

The primary concerns for TT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : UBER

The primary concerns for UBER are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

TT profiles as a value stock while UBER is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.21 — expect wider price swings.

UBER is growing revenue faster at 20.1% — sustainability is the question.

UBER generates stronger free cash flow (2.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UBER scores higher overall (56/100 vs 52/100), backed by strong 19.3% margins and 20.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Trane Technologies plc

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Trane Technologies plc is an American Irish domiciled diversified industrial manufacturing company. It is headquartered near Dublin, Ireland.

Uber Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Uber Technologies, Inc., commonly known as Uber, is an American technology company. Its services include ride-hailing, food delivery (Uber Eats), package delivery, couriers, freight transportation, and, through a partnership with Lime, electric bicycle and motorized scooter rental. The company is based in San Francisco, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?