Trustmark Corporation (TRMK)vsWells Fargo & Company (WFC)
TRMK
Trustmark Corporation
$48.52
+0.06%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $2.76B
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$89.16
+0.88%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $267.29B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Wells Fargo & Company generates 10078% more annual revenue ($83.03B vs $815.77M). TRMK leads profitability with a 28.7% profit margin vs 27.2%. WFC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.63. WFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).
TRMK
Strong Buy71
out of 100
Grade: B
WFC
Strong Buy76
out of 100
Grade: B+
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 37.6%
Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 37.4%
Keeps 27 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 25.0% YoY
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Distress zone — elevated risk
Expensive relative to growth rate
Distress zone — elevated risk
Elevated debt levels
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : TRMK
The strongest argument for TRMK centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.7% and operating margin at 37.6%. Revenue growth of 10.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : WFC
The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.2% and operating margin at 37.4%.
Bear Case : TRMK
The primary concerns for TRMK are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.
Bear Case : WFC
The primary concerns for WFC are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.55 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
WFC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.92 — expect wider price swings.
TRMK is growing revenue faster at 10.5% — sustainability is the question.
WFC generates stronger free cash flow (9.1B), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor BANKS - REGIONAL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
WFC scores higher overall (76/100 vs 71/100), backed by strong 27.2% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Trustmark Corporation
FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - REGIONAL · USA
Trustmark Corporation is the banking holding company for Trustmark National Bank providing banking and financial solutions to individuals and corporate institutions in the United States. The company is headquartered in Jackson, Mississippi.
Visit Website →Wells Fargo & Company
FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA
Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.
Compare with Other BANKS - REGIONAL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?