Trustmark Corporation (TRMK)vsWells Fargo & Company (WFC)
TRMK
Trustmark Corporation
$45.01
-0.77%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $2.59B
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
$87.44
+2.22%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $250.35B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Wells Fargo & Company generates 10034% more annual revenue ($83.11B vs $820.10M). TRMK leads profitability with a 28.7% profit margin vs 27.6%. WFC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.30. WFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).
TRMK
Strong Buy65
out of 100
Grade: B-
WFC
Strong Buy74
out of 100
Grade: B
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 35.3%
Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Strong operational efficiency at 34.2%
Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 6.8B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
3.5% revenue growth
Distress zone — elevated risk
0.4% revenue growth
Elevated debt levels
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : TRMK
The strongest argument for TRMK centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.7% and operating margin at 35.3%.
Bull Case : WFC
The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.6% and operating margin at 34.2%. PEG of 1.30 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : TRMK
The primary concerns for TRMK are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score.
Bear Case : WFC
The primary concerns for WFC are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
WFC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.95 — expect wider price swings.
TRMK is growing revenue faster at 3.5% — sustainability is the question.
WFC generates stronger free cash flow (6.8B), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor BANKS - REGIONAL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
WFC scores higher overall (74/100 vs 65/100), backed by strong 27.6% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Trustmark Corporation
FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - REGIONAL · USA
Trustmark Corporation is the banking holding company for Trustmark National Bank providing banking and financial solutions to individuals and corporate institutions in the United States. The company is headquartered in Jackson, Mississippi.
Visit Website →Wells Fargo & Company
FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA
Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.
Compare with Other BANKS - REGIONAL Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?