WallStSmart

Tantech Holdings Ltd (TANH)vsTarget Corporation (TGT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 277218% more annual revenue ($106.38B vs $38.36M). TGT leads profitability with a 3.2% profit margin vs -80.9%. TGT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

TANH

Avoid

29

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 5.09

TGT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

TANHSignificantly Overvalued (-73.0%)

Margin of Safety

-73.0%

Fair Value

$0.53

Current Price

$0.43

$0.10 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.53Overvalued
TGTUndervalued (+4.0%)

Margin of Safety

+4.0%

Fair Value

$119.45

Current Price

$122.57

$3.12 discount

UndervaluedFair: $119.45Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

TANH3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.0910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

TGT4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$55.95B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
21.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.289/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
16.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

TANH4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$6.90M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
3.8%3/10

ROE of 3.8% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-16.9%2/10

Revenue declined 16.9%

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.304/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
3.2%3/10

3.2% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : TANH

The strongest argument for TANH centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : TANH

The primary concerns for TANH are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 3.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

TANH profiles as a turnaround stock while TGT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

TGT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.01 — expect wider price swings.

TGT is growing revenue faster at 6.7% — sustainability is the question.

TANH generates stronger free cash flow (-2M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TGT scores higher overall (52/100 vs 29/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Tantech Holdings Ltd

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · China

Tantech Holdings Ltd, develops and manufactures bamboo-based charcoal products for industrial energy, domestic cooking, heating, purification, agriculture and cleaning applications in the People's Republic of China and internationally. The company is headquartered in Lishui, the People's Republic of China.

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?