WallStSmart

Constellation Brands Inc Class A (STZ)vsWPP PLC ADR (WPP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

WPP PLC ADR generates 44% more annual revenue ($13.55B vs $9.38B). STZ leads profitability with a 11.8% profit margin vs -1.6%. WPP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.23. STZ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

STZ

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.61

WPP

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

STZSignificantly Overvalued (-276.7%)

Margin of Safety

-276.7%

Fair Value

$43.32

Current Price

$151.56

$108.24 premium

UndervaluedFair: $43.32Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WPP.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

STZ1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.9%

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

STZ4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.614/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.383/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
5.462/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-9.8%2/10

Revenue declined 9.8%

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : STZ

The strongest argument for STZ centers on Operating Margin.

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : STZ

The primary concerns for STZ are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

STZ profiles as a declining stock while WPP is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

WPP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.53 — expect wider price swings.

WPP is growing revenue faster at -8.3% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

STZ scores higher overall (50/100 vs 35/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Constellation Brands Inc Class A

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - BREWERS · USA

Constellation Brands, Inc., headquartered in Victor, New York, is an American producer and marketer of beer, wine, and spirits.

Visit Website →

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?