WallStSmart

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)vsWD-40 Company (WDFC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B generates 733% more annual revenue ($5.30B vs $636.48M). SQM leads profitability with a 15.4% profit margin vs 12.6%. SQM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.34. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

SQM

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.04

WDFC

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 3.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 4.86

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
41.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.8%10/10

Revenue surging 69.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
165.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 165.2% YoY

WDFC2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
31.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.8610/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

WDFC4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
33.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
10.2x4/10

Trading at 10.2x book value

PEG RatioValuation
3.762/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-31.5%2/10

Earnings declined 31.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 41.1%. Revenue growth of 69.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WDFC

The strongest argument for WDFC centers on Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 10.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : WDFC

The primary concerns for WDFC are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SQM profiles as a growth stock while WDFC is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SQM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 69.8% — sustainability is the question.

SQM generates stronger free cash flow (679M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (74/100 vs 50/100), backed by strong 15.4% margins and 69.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

WD-40 Company

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

WD-40 Company develops and sells maintenance products and cleaning and home care products in America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in San Diego, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?