WallStSmart

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)vsTronox Holdings PLC (TROX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B generates 81% more annual revenue ($5.30B vs $2.92B). SQM leads profitability with a 15.4% profit margin vs -15.8%. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

SQM

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.04

TROX

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.77
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SQM.

TROXUndervalued (+75.3%)

Margin of Safety

+75.3%

Fair Value

$34.11

Current Price

$7.34

$26.77 discount

UndervaluedFair: $34.11Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
41.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.8%10/10

Revenue surging 69.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
165.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 165.2% YoY

TROX3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.269/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

EPS GrowthGrowth
48.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 48.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

TROX4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.0%4/10

3.0% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$1.16B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-30.8%2/10

ROE of -30.8% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 41.1%. Revenue growth of 69.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TROX

The strongest argument for TROX centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : TROX

The primary concerns for TROX are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SQM profiles as a growth stock while TROX is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

SQM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 69.8% — sustainability is the question.

SQM generates stronger free cash flow (679M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (74/100 vs 48/100), backed by strong 15.4% margins and 69.8% revenue growth. TROX offers better value entry with a 75.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Tronox Holdings PLC

BASIC MATERIALS · CHEMICALS · USA

Tronox Holdings plc is a vertically integrated manufacturer of TiO2 pigment in North America, South and Central America, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?