WallStSmart

Sony Group Corp (SONY)vsUTime Limited (WTO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sony Group Corp generates 5883100% more annual revenue ($12.48T vs $212.12M). SONY leads profitability with a -2.6% profit margin vs -251.5%. SONY earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

SONY

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.44

WTO

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 3.0Value: 6.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -16.40
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SONY.

WTOUndervalued (+44.6%)

Margin of Safety

+44.6%

Fair Value

$1.25

Current Price

$1.01

$0.24 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1.25Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SONY5 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$379.67B10/10

Generating 379.7B in free cash flow

Market CapQuality
$124.55B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.219/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.4%8/10

15.4% revenue growth

WTO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

SONY4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.924/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-4.2%2/10

ROE of -4.2% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-57.5%2/10

Earnings declined 57.5%

Profit MarginProfitability
-2.6%1/10

Currently unprofitable

WTO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$1.68M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-347.8%2/10

ROE of -347.8% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SONY

The strongest argument for SONY centers on Free Cash Flow, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 15.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WTO

The strongest argument for WTO centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : SONY

The primary concerns for SONY are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : WTO

The primary concerns for WTO are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SONY profiles as a growth stock while WTO is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONY carries more volatility with a beta of 0.74 — expect wider price swings.

SONY is growing revenue faster at 15.4% — sustainability is the question.

SONY generates stronger free cash flow (379.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SONY scores higher overall (47/100 vs 35/100) and 15.4% revenue growth. WTO offers better value entry with a 44.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Sony Group Corp

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sony Group Corporation designs, develops, produces and sells electronic equipment, instruments and devices for the consumer, professional and industrial markets worldwide. The company is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan.

UTime Limited

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

UTime Limited, designs, develops, manufactures, sells, and operates mobile phones, accessories, and related consumer electronics. The company is headquartered in Shenzhen, China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?