WallStSmart

Sonos Inc (SONO)vsZscaler Inc (ZS)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Zscaler Inc generates 125% more annual revenue ($3.35B vs $1.49B). SONO leads profitability with a 3.8% profit margin vs -1.9%. SONO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

SONO

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 3.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04

ZS

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.81
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-32.2%)

Margin of Safety

-32.2%

Fair Value

$12.48

Current Price

$16.41

$3.93 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.48Overvalued
ZSUndervalued (+44.6%)

Margin of Safety

+44.6%

Fair Value

$308.72

Current Price

$197.66

$111.06 discount

UndervaluedFair: $308.72Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.129/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

ZS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
24.9%8/10

Revenue surging 24.9% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
38.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.8%3/10

3.8% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.4%3/10

Operating margin of 4.4%

ZS4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
12.4x4/10

Trading at 12.4x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.622/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : ZS

The strongest argument for ZS centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 24.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 3.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : ZS

The primary concerns for ZS are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SONO profiles as a value stock while ZS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.88 — expect wider price swings.

ZS is growing revenue faster at 24.9% — sustainability is the question.

ZS generates stronger free cash flow (64M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SONO scores higher overall (47/100 vs 32/100). ZS offers better value entry with a 44.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Zscaler Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Zscaler, Inc. is a global cloud security company. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?