WallStSmart

Sonos Inc (SONO)vsZscaler Inc (ZS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Zscaler Inc generates 117% more annual revenue ($3.17B vs $1.46B). SONO leads profitability with a 1.6% profit margin vs -2.4%. SONO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

SONO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 3.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04

ZS

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 7.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-34.7%)

Margin of Safety

-34.7%

Fair Value

$12.25

Current Price

$14.32

$2.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.25Overvalued
ZSUndervalued (+44.6%)

Margin of Safety

+44.6%

Fair Value

$308.92

Current Price

$124.06

$184.86 discount

UndervaluedFair: $308.92Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.159/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

ZS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.4%8/10

Revenue surging 25.4% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.83B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

ZS4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
8.5x4/10

Trading at 8.5x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.3%2/10

ROE of -3.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : ZS

The strongest argument for ZS centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 25.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.41 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 90.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : ZS

The primary concerns for ZS are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SONO profiles as a value stock while ZS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

ZS is growing revenue faster at 25.4% — sustainability is the question.

ZS generates stronger free cash flow (136M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SONO scores higher overall (45/100 vs 38/100). ZS offers better value entry with a 44.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Zscaler Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Zscaler, Inc. is a global cloud security company. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?