WallStSmart

Sonos Inc (SONO)vsZscaler Inc (ZS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Zscaler Inc generates 125% more annual revenue ($3.35B vs $1.49B). SONO leads profitability with a 3.8% profit margin vs -1.9%. SONO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

SONO

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 3.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04

ZS

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.81
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-32.1%)

Margin of Safety

-32.1%

Fair Value

$12.49

Current Price

$16.85

$4.36 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.49Overvalued
ZSUndervalued (+45.4%)

Margin of Safety

+45.4%

Fair Value

$313.25

Current Price

$210.18

$103.07 discount

UndervaluedFair: $313.25Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.129/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

ZS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
24.9%8/10

Revenue surging 24.9% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.3x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Market CapQuality
$1.72B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.8%3/10

3.8% margin — thin

ZS4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.024/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
13.2x4/10

Trading at 13.2x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : ZS

The strongest argument for ZS centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 24.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Return on Equity. Thin 3.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : ZS

The primary concerns for ZS are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SONO profiles as a value stock while ZS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

ZS is growing revenue faster at 24.9% — sustainability is the question.

ZS generates stronger free cash flow (64M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SONO scores higher overall (48/100 vs 32/100). ZS offers better value entry with a 45.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Zscaler Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Zscaler, Inc. is a global cloud security company. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?