WallStSmart

Sonos Inc (SONO)vsZoom Video Communications Inc (ZM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Zoom Video Communications Inc generates 239% more annual revenue ($4.87B vs $1.44B). ZM leads profitability with a 39.0% profit margin vs -1.2%. ZM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B-).

SONO

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0

ZM

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.0Value: 4.7Quality: 7.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 5.01
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SONOUndervalued (+42.1%)

Margin of Safety

+42.1%

Fair Value

$28.49

Current Price

$14.67

$13.82 discount

UndervaluedFair: $28.49Overvalued
ZMOvervalued (-8.7%)

Margin of Safety

-8.7%

Fair Value

$84.76

Current Price

$95.76

$11.00 premium

UndervaluedFair: $84.76Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SONO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

ZM6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Profit MarginProfitability
39.0%10/10

Keeps 39 of every $100 in revenue as profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
91.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 91.5% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.0110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
20.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 20 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.77B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.9%2/10

ROE of -3.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.9%2/10

Revenue declined 0.9%

Profit MarginProfitability
-1.2%1/10

Currently unprofitable

ZM1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.212/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth.

Bull Case : ZM

The strongest argument for ZM centers on Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 39.0% and operating margin at 21.5%.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : ZM

The primary concerns for ZM are PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SONO profiles as a turnaround stock while ZM is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 2.00 — expect wider price swings.

ZM is growing revenue faster at 5.3% — sustainability is the question.

ZM generates stronger free cash flow (338M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ZM scores higher overall (70/100 vs 42/100), backed by strong 39.0% margins. SONO offers better value entry with a 42.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Zoom Video Communications Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Zoom Video Communications, Inc. provides a premier video communications platform in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?