WallStSmart

SFL Corporation Ltd (SFL)vsZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd (ZIM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd generates 804% more annual revenue ($6.44B vs $712.36M). SFL leads profitability with a 9.0% profit margin vs 2.1%. ZIM trades at a lower P/E of 26.2x. SFL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

SFL

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 5.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.42

ZIM

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 4.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.62
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SFLUndervalued (+52.7%)

Margin of Safety

+52.7%

Fair Value

$21.14

Current Price

$13.18

$7.96 discount

UndervaluedFair: $21.14Overvalued
ZIMSignificantly Overvalued (-19.6%)

Margin of Safety

-19.6%

Fair Value

$17.67

Current Price

$29.57

$11.90 premium

UndervaluedFair: $17.67Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SFL3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
2179.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 2179.0% YoY

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

ZIM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
178.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 178.4% YoY

Areas to Watch

SFL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.7%4/10

2.7% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$1.74B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
3.3%3/10

ROE of 3.3% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

ZIM4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.624/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
2.5%3/10

ROE of 2.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SFL

The strongest argument for SFL centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Price/Book.

Bull Case : ZIM

The strongest argument for ZIM centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : SFL

The primary concerns for SFL are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. A P/E of 52.2x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 2.30 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : ZIM

The primary concerns for ZIM are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ZIM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.11 — expect wider price swings.

ZIM is growing revenue faster at 8.9% — sustainability is the question.

ZIM generates stronger free cash flow (286M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor MARINE SHIPPING industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

SFL scores higher overall (55/100 vs 54/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

SFL Corporation Ltd

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

SFL Corporation Ltd. is engaged in the ownership, operation and chartering of vessels and related assets offshore in medium and long-term charters. The company is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., provides container shipping and related services in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Haifa, Israel.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?