WallStSmart

SBA Communications Corp (SBAC)vsVertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co generates 285% more annual revenue ($10.84B vs $2.82B). SBAC leads profitability with a 37.4% profit margin vs 14.4%. VRT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.53. VRT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

SBAC

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -0.14

VRT

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 8.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.25
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SBACUndervalued (+12.1%)

Margin of Safety

+12.1%

Fair Value

$217.30

Current Price

$221.20

$3.90 discount

UndervaluedFair: $217.30Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for VRT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SBAC3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
37.4%10/10

Keeps 37 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
52.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 52.4%

EPS GrowthGrowth
115.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 115.6% YoY

VRT4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
45.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 45 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
30.1%10/10

Revenue surging 30.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
135.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 135.7% YoY

Market CapQuality
$117.61B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

SBAC4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.7%4/10

3.7% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

PEG RatioValuation
4.892/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.142/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

VRT3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.534/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
76.9x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
31.9x2/10

Trading at 31.9x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SBAC

The strongest argument for SBAC centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 37.4% and operating margin at 52.4%.

Bull Case : VRT

The strongest argument for VRT centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 30.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : SBAC

The primary concerns for SBAC are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : VRT

The primary concerns for VRT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 76.9x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SBAC profiles as a value stock while VRT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

VRT carries more volatility with a beta of 2.05 — expect wider price swings.

VRT is growing revenue faster at 30.1% — sustainability is the question.

VRT generates stronger free cash flow (654M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VRT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 54/100) and 30.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

SBA Communications Corp

REAL ESTATE · REIT - SPECIALTY · USA

SBA Communications Corporation is a real estate investment trust which owns and operates wireless infrastructure in the United States, Canada, Central America, South America, and South Africa.

Vertiv Holdings Co

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Vertiv Holdings Co designs, manufactures and services critical digital infrastructure technologies and lifecycle services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?