WallStSmart

EchoStar Corporation (SATS)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

EchoStar Corporation generates 298% more annual revenue ($15.00B vs $3.77B). WAT leads profitability with a 11.9% profit margin vs -96.6%. SATS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.34. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

SATS

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 7.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.08

WAT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SATSUndervalued (+66.0%)

Margin of Safety

+66.0%

Fair Value

$323.23

Current Price

$127.15

$196.08 discount

UndervaluedFair: $323.23Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-63.1%)

Margin of Safety

-63.1%

Fair Value

$201.83

Current Price

$355.13

$153.30 premium

UndervaluedFair: $201.83Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SATS0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.5%10/10

Revenue surging 91.5% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

SATS4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-111.3%2/10

ROE of -111.3% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.3%2/10

Revenue declined 4.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-85.6%2/10

Earnings declined 85.6%

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
5.2%3/10

ROE of 5.2% — below average capital efficiency

P/E RatioValuation
44.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SATS

PEG of 1.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : SATS

The primary concerns for SATS are Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 4.40 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 44.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SATS profiles as a turnaround stock while WAT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.14 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.5% — sustainability is the question.

WAT generates stronger free cash flow (-42M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (52/100 vs 34/100) and 91.5% revenue growth. SATS offers better value entry with a 66.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

EchoStar Corporation

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

EchoStar Corporation provides broadband satellite technologies and broadband Internet services. The company is headquartered in Englewood, Colorado.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?