WallStSmart

Sanmina Corporation (SANM)vsSony Group Corp (SONY)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sony Group Corp generates 99370% more annual revenue ($12.70T vs $12.76B). SANM leads profitability with a 2.4% profit margin vs -1.8%. SANM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.67. SANM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).

SANM

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.87

SONY

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 7.3Profit: 4.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.43

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SANM3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.7%10/10

Revenue surging 69.7% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
68.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 68.3% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
0.678/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

SONY5 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$59.56B10/10

Generating 59.6B in free cash flow

Market CapQuality
$143.48B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.229/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
47.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 47.6% YoY

Areas to Watch

SANM3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
35.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.874/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
2.4%3/10

2.4% margin — thin

SONY3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.674/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-2.9%2/10

ROE of -2.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
-1.8%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SANM

The strongest argument for SANM centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 69.7% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.67 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SONY

The strongest argument for SONY centers on Free Cash Flow, Market Cap, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : SANM

The primary concerns for SANM are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin. Thin 2.4% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SONY

The primary concerns for SONY are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SANM profiles as a hypergrowth stock while SONY is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

SANM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.60 — expect wider price swings.

SANM is growing revenue faster at 69.7% — sustainability is the question.

SONY generates stronger free cash flow (59.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SANM scores higher overall (71/100 vs 59/100) and 69.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Sanmina Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

Sanmina Corporation offers integrated solutions for manufacturing, components, products and repair, logistics and after-sales services globally. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Sony Group Corp

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sony Group Corporation designs, develops, produces and sells electronic equipment, instruments and devices for the consumer, professional and industrial markets worldwide. The company is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?