WallStSmart

Raytheon Technologies Corp (RTX)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Raytheon Technologies Corp generates 2297% more annual revenue ($90.37B vs $3.77B). WAT leads profitability with a 11.9% profit margin vs 8.0%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.52. RTX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

RTX

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.0Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.55

WAT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

RTXSignificantly Overvalued (-51.9%)

Margin of Safety

-51.9%

Fair Value

$116.35

Current Price

$176.09

$59.74 premium

UndervaluedFair: $116.35Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-63.1%)

Margin of Safety

-63.1%

Fair Value

$201.83

Current Price

$355.13

$153.30 premium

UndervaluedFair: $201.83Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

RTX3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$238.07B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
32.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 32.5% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.21B8/10

Generating 1.2B in free cash flow

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.5%10/10

Revenue surging 91.5% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

RTX3 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.434/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
33.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.554/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
5.2%3/10

ROE of 5.2% — below average capital efficiency

P/E RatioValuation
44.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : RTX

The strongest argument for RTX centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : RTX

The primary concerns for RTX are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 44.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

RTX profiles as a value stock while WAT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.14 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.5% — sustainability is the question.

RTX generates stronger free cash flow (1.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

RTX scores higher overall (59/100 vs 52/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Raytheon Technologies Corp

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Raytheon Technologies Corporation is an American multinational aerospace and defense conglomerate headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts. It is one of the largest aerospace, intelligence services providers, and defense manufacturers in the world by revenue and market capitalization. Raytheon Technologies (RTX) researches, develops, and manufactures advanced technology products in the aerospace and defense industry, including aircraft engines, avionics, aerostructures, cybersecurity, guided missiles, air defense systems, satellites, and drones.

Visit Website →

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?