WallStSmart

RadNet Inc (RDNT)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waters Corporation generates 55% more annual revenue ($3.17B vs $2.04B). WAT leads profitability with a 20.3% profit margin vs -0.9%. RDNT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.96. WAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

RDNT

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 4.0Value: 6.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.19

WAT

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 9.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for RDNT.

WATSignificantly Overvalued (-349.9%)

Margin of Safety

-349.9%

Fair Value

$73.17

Current Price

$302.32

$229.15 premium

UndervaluedFair: $73.17Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

RDNT2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
75.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 75.0% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
0.968/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

WAT4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
29.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
20.3%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

RDNT4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
1.4%3/10

ROE of 1.4% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-230.86M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.192/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

WAT2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.1%2/10

Earnings declined 3.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : RDNT

The strongest argument for RDNT centers on EPS Growth, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 14.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.96 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Operating Margin, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.3% and operating margin at 33.8%. PEG of 1.25 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : RDNT

The primary concerns for RDNT are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

RDNT profiles as a turnaround stock while WAT is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

RDNT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.46 — expect wider price swings.

RDNT is growing revenue faster at 14.8% — sustainability is the question.

WAT generates stronger free cash flow (126M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAT scores higher overall (60/100 vs 54/100), backed by strong 20.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

RadNet Inc

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

RadNet, Inc., provides outpatient imaging services in the United States. The company is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?