WallStSmart

Recon Technology Ltd (RCON)vsSchlumberger NV (SLB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Schlumberger NV generates 32792% more annual revenue ($35.94B vs $109.27M). SLB leads profitability with a 9.3% profit margin vs -25.5%. SLB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

RCON

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.55

SLB

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 5.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for RCON.

SLBUndervalued (+10.2%)

Margin of Safety

+10.2%

Fair Value

$61.08

Current Price

$58.02

$3.06 discount

UndervaluedFair: $61.08Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

RCON4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
102.2%10/10

Revenue surging 102.2% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0810/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.5510/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

SLB1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$83.54B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

RCON4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$50.76M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-9.2%2/10

ROE of -9.2% — below average capital efficiency

SLB4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.884/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.7%4/10

2.7% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-13.8%2/10

Earnings declined 13.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : RCON

The strongest argument for RCON centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 102.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SLB

The strongest argument for SLB centers on Market Cap.

Bear Case : RCON

The primary concerns for RCON are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : SLB

The primary concerns for SLB are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

RCON profiles as a hypergrowth stock while SLB is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

RCON carries more volatility with a beta of 1.48 — expect wider price swings.

RCON is growing revenue faster at 102.2% — sustainability is the question.

SLB generates stronger free cash flow (144M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SLB scores higher overall (48/100 vs 41/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Recon Technology Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · China

Recon Technology, Ltd. provides hardware, software and on-site services to companies in the oil extraction and extraction industry in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China.

Visit Website →

Schlumberger NV

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Schlumberger Limited is an oilfield services company. Schlumberger has four principal executive offices located in Paris, Houston, London, and The Hague.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?