WallStSmart

QuickLogic Corporation (QUIK)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sonos Inc generates 9968% more annual revenue ($1.46B vs $14.50M). SONO leads profitability with a 1.6% profit margin vs -102.3%. SONO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

QUIK

Avoid

22

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 4.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -10.00

SONO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 3.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QUIK.

SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-34.6%)

Margin of Safety

-34.6%

Fair Value

$12.26

Current Price

$15.08

$2.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

QUIK2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.149/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.8%8/10

16.8% revenue growth

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.159/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

QUIK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Price/BookValuation
17.3x4/10

Trading at 17.3x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$386.38M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.88B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : QUIK

The strongest argument for QUIK centers on Debt/Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : QUIK

The primary concerns for QUIK are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Market Cap.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 92.8x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

QUIK profiles as a growth stock while SONO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

QUIK is growing revenue faster at 16.8% — sustainability is the question.

QUIK generates stronger free cash flow (63,000), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SONO scores higher overall (45/100 vs 22/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

QuickLogic Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTORS · USA

QuickLogic Corporation, a semiconductor company, develops semiconductor platforms and intellectual property solutions for smartphones, wearable devices, listening devices, tablets, and Internet of Things devices. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?