WallStSmart

Quhuo Limited American Depository Shares (QH)vsUber Technologies Inc (UBER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Uber Technologies Inc generates 2025% more annual revenue ($53.69B vs $2.53B). UBER leads profitability with a 15.9% profit margin vs -5.9%. UBER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

QH

Avoid

29

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.24

UBER

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QH.

UBERUndervalued (+3.8%)

Margin of Safety

+3.8%

Fair Value

$71.28

Current Price

$72.21

$0.93 discount

UndervaluedFair: $71.28Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

QH1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

UBER4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
34.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 35 in profit

Market CapQuality
$145.79B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
17.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.29B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

QH4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$10.58M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-14.6%2/10

ROE of -14.6% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.3%2/10

Revenue declined 2.3%

UBER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.982/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-84.6%2/10

Earnings declined 84.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : QH

The strongest argument for QH centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : UBER

The strongest argument for UBER centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.9% and operating margin at 14.6%. Revenue growth of 14.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : QH

The primary concerns for QH are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : UBER

The primary concerns for UBER are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

QH profiles as a turnaround stock while UBER is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

UBER carries more volatility with a beta of 1.16 — expect wider price swings.

UBER is growing revenue faster at 14.5% — sustainability is the question.

UBER generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UBER scores higher overall (54/100 vs 29/100), backed by strong 15.9% margins and 14.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Quhuo Limited American Depository Shares

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · China

Quhuo Limited, operates an operational solutions platform for the workforce in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China.

Visit Website →

Uber Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Uber Technologies, Inc., commonly known as Uber, is an American technology company. Its services include ride-hailing, food delivery (Uber Eats), package delivery, couriers, freight transportation, and, through a partnership with Lime, electric bicycle and motorized scooter rental. The company is based in San Francisco, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?