WallStSmart

Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Qualcomm Incorporated generates 1317% more annual revenue ($44.87B vs $3.17B). WAT leads profitability with a 20.3% profit margin vs 12.0%. QCOM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.55. QCOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

QCOM

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 7.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.17

WAT

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 9.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

QCOMSignificantly Overvalued (-285.6%)

Margin of Safety

-285.6%

Fair Value

$33.80

Current Price

$130.35

$96.55 premium

UndervaluedFair: $33.80Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-349.9%)

Margin of Safety

-349.9%

Fair Value

$73.17

Current Price

$302.32

$229.15 premium

UndervaluedFair: $73.17Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

QCOM6 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Market CapQuality
$137.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
21.5%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.558/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
27.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.5%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.42B8/10

Generating 4.4B in free cash flow

WAT4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
33.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.8%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
29.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
20.3%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

QCOM2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.9x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-1.8%2/10

Earnings declined 1.8%

WAT2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.1%2/10

Earnings declined 3.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : QCOM

The strongest argument for QCOM centers on Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Return on Equity. PEG of 0.55 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Operating Margin, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.3% and operating margin at 33.8%. PEG of 1.25 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : QCOM

The primary concerns for QCOM are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

QCOM profiles as a value stock while WAT is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

QCOM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.27 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 6.8% — sustainability is the question.

QCOM generates stronger free cash flow (4.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QCOM scores higher overall (61/100 vs 60/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Qualcomm Incorporated

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTORS · USA

Qualcomm is an American multinational corporation headquartered in San Diego, California, and incorporated in Delaware. It creates semiconductors, software, and services related to wireless technology. It owns patents critical to the 5G, 4G, CDMA2000, TD-SCDMA and WCDMA mobile communications standards.

Visit Website →

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?