WallStSmart

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)vsUniversal Corporation (UVV)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation generates 621% more annual revenue ($20.99B vs $2.91B). PH leads profitability with a 16.6% profit margin vs 2.9%. UVV appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.06. PH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

PH

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 3.7Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78

UVV

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PH.

UVVUndervalued (+33.4%)

Margin of Safety

+33.4%

Fair Value

$79.32

Current Price

$53.70

$25.62 discount

UndervaluedFair: $79.32Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$111.82B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
24.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.5%

UVV2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

PH3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

PEG RatioValuation
3.542/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-4.2%2/10

Earnings declined 4.2%

UVV4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$1.34B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
7.0%3/10

ROE of 7.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
3.062/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.6% and operating margin at 21.5%. Revenue growth of 10.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : UVV

The strongest argument for UVV centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : UVV

The primary concerns for UVV are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PH profiles as a mature stock while UVV is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

PH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.18 — expect wider price swings.

PH is growing revenue faster at 10.6% — sustainability is the question.

PH generates stronger free cash flow (881M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PH scores higher overall (55/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 16.6% margins and 10.6% revenue growth. UVV offers better value entry with a 33.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

Universal Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · TOBACCO · USA

Universal Corporation processes and supplies leaf tobacco and plant ingredients worldwide. The company is headquartered in Richmond, Virginia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?