WallStSmart

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)vsTwin Disc Incorporated (TWIN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation generates 5778% more annual revenue ($20.46B vs $348.10M). PH leads profitability with a 17.3% profit margin vs 6.3%. TWIN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.16. TWIN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

PH

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78

TWIN

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PHSignificantly Overvalued (-435.1%)

Margin of Safety

-435.1%

Fair Value

$186.12

Current Price

$921.56

$735.44 premium

UndervaluedFair: $186.12Overvalued
TWINUndervalued (+75.8%)

Margin of Safety

+75.8%

Fair Value

$71.14

Current Price

$15.65

$55.49 discount

UndervaluedFair: $71.14Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$116.70B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.7%

TWIN3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
22.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 22.4% YoY

Areas to Watch

PH4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
33.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
8.1x4/10

Trading at 8.1x book value

PEG RatioValuation
3.632/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Earnings declined 9.0%

TWIN4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.3%4/10

0.3% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$228.58M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
6.3%3/10

6.3% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.5%3/10

Operating margin of 1.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 21.7%.

Bull Case : TWIN

The strongest argument for TWIN centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : TWIN

The primary concerns for TWIN are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PH profiles as a mature stock while TWIN is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

PH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.22 — expect wider price swings.

PH is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

PH generates stronger free cash flow (768M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TWIN scores higher overall (55/100 vs 54/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

Twin Disc Incorporated

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Twin Disc, Incorporated designs, manufactures and sells power transmission equipment for off-highway and marine use worldwide. The company is headquartered in Racine, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?