WallStSmart

Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)vsQXO, Inc. (QXO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation generates 199% more annual revenue ($20.46B vs $6.84B). PH leads profitability with a 17.3% profit margin vs -4.1%. QXO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.88. PH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

PH

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 3.7Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78

QXO

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.5Value: 3.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PH.

QXOSignificantly Overvalued (-17.0%)

Margin of Safety

-17.0%

Fair Value

$23.12

Current Price

$19.61

$3.51 premium

UndervaluedFair: $23.12Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$119.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.7%

QXO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
14725.0%10/10

Revenue surging 14725.0% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

PH4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
8.0x4/10

Trading at 8.0x book value

PEG RatioValuation
3.912/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Earnings declined 9.0%

QXO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.882/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.8%2/10

ROE of -3.8% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 21.7%.

Bull Case : QXO

The strongest argument for QXO centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 14725.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : QXO

The primary concerns for QXO are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PH profiles as a mature stock while QXO is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

QXO carries more volatility with a beta of 2.47 — expect wider price swings.

QXO is growing revenue faster at 14725.0% — sustainability is the question.

PH generates stronger free cash flow (768M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PH scores higher overall (54/100 vs 48/100), backed by strong 17.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

QXO, Inc.

INDUSTRIALS · INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION · USA

QXO, Inc. is a business application, technology, and consulting company in North America. The company is headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?