WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsZscaler Inc (ZS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 230% more annual revenue ($9.89B vs $3.00B). PANW leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs -2.3%. ZS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.52. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

PANW

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02

ZS

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.3Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWUndervalued (+56.7%)

Margin of Safety

+56.7%

Fair Value

$454.04

Current Price

$207.88

$246.16 discount

UndervaluedFair: $454.04Overvalued
ZSUndervalued (+47.3%)

Margin of Safety

+47.3%

Fair Value

$324.31

Current Price

$152.13

$172.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $324.31Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$159.39B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

ZS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.9%8/10

Revenue surging 25.9% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
15.6x4/10

Trading at 15.6x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.092/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
109.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

ZS4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
11.1x4/10

Trading at 11.1x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : ZS

The strongest argument for ZS centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 25.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 109.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : ZS

The primary concerns for ZS are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PANW profiles as a value stock while ZS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

ZS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.96 — expect wider price swings.

ZS is growing revenue faster at 25.9% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (470M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (56/100 vs 34/100) and 14.9% revenue growth. ZS offers better value entry with a 47.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Zscaler Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Zscaler, Inc. is a global cloud security company. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?