WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsZscaler Inc (ZS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 234% more annual revenue ($10.61B vs $3.17B). PANW leads profitability with a 8.0% profit margin vs -2.4%. ZS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.41. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

PANW

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 3.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02

ZS

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 7.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWUndervalued (+38.8%)

Margin of Safety

+38.8%

Fair Value

$470.35

Current Price

$285.26

$185.09 discount

UndervaluedFair: $470.35Overvalued
ZSUndervalued (+44.6%)

Margin of Safety

+44.6%

Fair Value

$308.92

Current Price

$124.06

$184.86 discount

UndervaluedFair: $308.92Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$231.90B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Revenue GrowthGrowth
31.1%10/10

Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

ZS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.4%8/10

Revenue surging 25.4% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
8.4x4/10

Trading at 8.4x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
8.0%3/10

8.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

ZS4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
8.5x4/10

Trading at 8.5x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.3%2/10

ROE of -3.3% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : ZS

The strongest argument for ZS centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 25.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.41 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Price/Book, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 247.4x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : ZS

The primary concerns for ZS are Price/Book, EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PANW profiles as a hypergrowth stock while ZS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

ZS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.96 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (47/100 vs 38/100) and 31.1% revenue growth. ZS offers better value entry with a 44.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Zscaler Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Zscaler, Inc. is a global cloud security company. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?