WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsZscaler Inc (ZS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 242% more annual revenue ($11.48B vs $3.35B). PANW leads profitability with a 2.7% profit margin vs -1.9%. PANW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.73. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

PANW

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 1/9

ZS

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.81
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWUndervalued (+27.4%)

Margin of Safety

+27.4%

Fair Value

$500.75

Current Price

$371.76

$128.99 discount

UndervaluedFair: $500.75Overvalued
ZSUndervalued (+45.4%)

Margin of Safety

+45.4%

Fair Value

$313.25

Current Price

$210.18

$103.07 discount

UndervaluedFair: $313.25Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
Market CapQuality
$270.47B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Revenue GrowthGrowth
34.4%10/10

Revenue surging 34.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0910/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.27B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

ZS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
24.9%8/10

Revenue surging 24.9% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.734/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
11.0x4/10

Trading at 11.0x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.7%3/10

2.7% margin — thin

ZS4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.024/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
13.2x4/10

Trading at 13.2x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 34.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : ZS

The strongest argument for ZS centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 24.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 295.2x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : ZS

The primary concerns for ZS are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PANW profiles as a hypergrowth stock while ZS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

ZS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.95 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 34.4% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (51/100 vs 32/100) and 34.4% revenue growth. ZS offers better value entry with a 45.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Zscaler Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Zscaler, Inc. is a global cloud security company. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?