WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsWorkiva Inc (WK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 1018% more annual revenue ($9.89B vs $884.57M). PANW leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs -3.0%. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

PANW

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02

WK

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 2.5Value: 6.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.30
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWUndervalued (+60.8%)

Margin of Safety

+60.8%

Fair Value

$457.02

Current Price

$179.32

$277.70 discount

UndervaluedFair: $457.02Overvalued
WKUndervalued (+16.3%)

Margin of Safety

+16.3%

Fair Value

$77.57

Current Price

$53.91

$23.66 discount

UndervaluedFair: $77.57Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$145.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

WK1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
19.5%8/10

19.5% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
13.4x4/10

Trading at 13.4x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.052/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
100.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

WK4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Operating MarginProfitability
3.3%3/10

Operating margin of 3.3%

Return on EquityProfitability
-2763.0%2/10

ROE of -2763.0% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.302/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WK

The strongest argument for WK centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 19.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 100.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : WK

The primary concerns for WK are EPS Growth, Operating Margin, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PANW profiles as a value stock while WK is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

PANW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.77 — expect wider price swings.

WK is growing revenue faster at 19.5% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (470M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (56/100 vs 32/100) and 14.9% revenue growth. WK offers better value entry with a 16.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Workiva Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Workiva Inc. provides global cloud-based compliance and regulatory reporting solutions. The company is headquartered in Ames, Iowa.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?