WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsSemtech Corporation (SMTC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 878% more annual revenue ($11.48B vs $1.17B). SMTC leads profitability with a 13.1% profit margin vs 2.7%. PANW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.73. SMTC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

PANW

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 4.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 1/9

SMTC

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 7.0Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.06
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWUndervalued (+27.4%)

Margin of Safety

+27.4%

Fair Value

$500.75

Current Price

$363.58

$137.17 discount

UndervaluedFair: $500.75Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SMTC.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
Market CapQuality
$270.47B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Revenue GrowthGrowth
34.4%10/10

Revenue surging 34.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0910/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.27B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

SMTC3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
32.7%10/10

Revenue surging 32.7% year-over-year

Return on EquityProfitability
20.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
22.7%8/10

Earnings expanding 22.7% YoY

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.734/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
10.8x4/10

Trading at 10.8x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.7%3/10

2.7% margin — thin

SMTC4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.392/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
107.7x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
30.0x2/10

Trading at 30.0x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.062/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 34.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SMTC

The strongest argument for SMTC centers on Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 32.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 295.2x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SMTC

The primary concerns for SMTC are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 107.7x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PANW profiles as a hypergrowth stock while SMTC is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SMTC carries more volatility with a beta of 2.35 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 34.4% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SMTC scores higher overall (60/100 vs 51/100) and 32.7% revenue growth. PANW offers better value entry with a 27.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Semtech Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTORS · USA

Semtech Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, and markets mixed-signal and analog semiconductor products and advanced algorithms. The company is headquartered in Camarillo, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?