WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsSentinelOne Inc (S)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 911% more annual revenue ($10.61B vs $1.05B). PANW leads profitability with a 8.0% profit margin vs -30.4%. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

PANW

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 3.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02

S

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: -0.15
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWUndervalued (+38.8%)

Margin of Safety

+38.8%

Fair Value

$470.35

Current Price

$272.05

$198.30 discount

UndervaluedFair: $470.35Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for S.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$231.90B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Revenue GrowthGrowth
31.1%10/10

Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

S1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
20.8%8/10

Revenue surging 20.8% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
8.0%3/10

8.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.562/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

S4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-31.4%2/10

ROE of -31.4% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.152/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : S

The strongest argument for S centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 20.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 247.4x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : S

The primary concerns for S are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PANW profiles as a hypergrowth stock while S is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

PANW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.94 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (47/100 vs 33/100) and 31.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

SentinelOne Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

SentinelOne, Inc. is a cybersecurity provider in the United States. The company is headquartered in Mountain View, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?