WallStSmart

Palo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)vsQuantum Corporation (QMCO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 3694% more annual revenue ($10.61B vs $279.58M). PANW leads profitability with a 8.0% profit margin vs -36.1%. QMCO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.77. QMCO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

PANW

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 3.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02

QMCO

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -8.59
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PANWUndervalued (+30.6%)

Margin of Safety

+30.6%

Fair Value

$469.31

Current Price

$325.91

$143.40 discount

UndervaluedFair: $469.31Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for QMCO.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PANW4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$275.72B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Revenue GrowthGrowth
31.1%10/10

Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

QMCO3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-0.7710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.778/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Revenue GrowthGrowth
27.3%8/10

Revenue surging 27.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
9.6x4/10

Trading at 9.6x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
8.0%3/10

8.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

QMCO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$400.05M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.20M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : QMCO

The strongest argument for QMCO centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 27.3% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.77 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Price/Book, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 277.3x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : QMCO

The primary concerns for QMCO are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PANW profiles as a hypergrowth stock while QMCO is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

QMCO carries more volatility with a beta of 2.96 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QMCO scores higher overall (49/100 vs 47/100) and 27.3% revenue growth. PANW offers better value entry with a 30.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Quantum Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · COMPUTER HARDWARE · USA

Quantum Corporation offers products for storing and managing digital video and unstructured data in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?