WallStSmart

Ranpak Holdings Corp (PACK)vsSea Ltd (SE)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sea Ltd generates 6534% more annual revenue ($27.72B vs $417.90M). SE leads profitability with a 5.9% profit margin vs -9.1%. SE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

PACK

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.69

SE

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.53
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PACK.

SEUndervalued (+55.9%)

Margin of Safety

+55.9%

Fair Value

$259.48

Current Price

$99.55

$159.93 discount

UndervaluedFair: $259.48Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PACK1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SE4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
48.1%10/10

Revenue surging 48.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$63.26B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
1.008/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.15B8/10

Generating 1.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

PACK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$342.18M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-7.3%2/10

ROE of -7.3% — below average capital efficiency

SE3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
39.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
5.9%3/10

5.9% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PACK

The strongest argument for PACK centers on Price/Book. Revenue growth of 14.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SE

The strongest argument for SE centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 48.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.00 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : PACK

The primary concerns for PACK are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : SE

The primary concerns for SE are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PACK profiles as a turnaround stock while SE is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

PACK carries more volatility with a beta of 3.10 — expect wider price swings.

SE is growing revenue faster at 48.1% — sustainability is the question.

SE generates stronger free cash flow (1.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SE scores higher overall (60/100 vs 44/100) and 48.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ranpak Holdings Corp

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · PACKAGING & CONTAINERS · USA

Ranpak Holdings Corp. The company is headquartered in Concord Township, Ohio.

Sea Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Sea Limited is engaged in the digital entertainment, e-commerce and digital financial services businesses in Southeast Asia, Latin America, the rest of Asia and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?