WallStSmart

Ozon Holdings PLC (OZON)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ozon Holdings PLC generates 20915% more annual revenue ($306.79B vs $1.46B). SONO leads profitability with a 1.6% profit margin vs -9.3%. SONO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

OZON

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.08

SONO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 3.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OZON.

SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-34.6%)

Margin of Safety

-34.6%

Fair Value

$12.26

Current Price

$15.08

$2.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OZON3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
46.7%10/10

Revenue surging 46.7% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
-3.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Free Cash FlowQuality
$60.67B10/10

Generating 60.7B in free cash flow

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.159/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

OZON4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-665.0%2/10

ROE of -665.0% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.082/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.88B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OZON

The strongest argument for OZON centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 46.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : OZON

The primary concerns for OZON are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 92.8x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OZON profiles as a hypergrowth stock while SONO is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

OZON is growing revenue faster at 46.7% — sustainability is the question.

OZON generates stronger free cash flow (60.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SONO scores higher overall (45/100 vs 39/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ozon Holdings PLC

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE & IT SERVICES · USA

Ozon Holdings PLC, is an Internet retailer of multi-category consumer products for the general public, primarily in the Russian Federation. The company is headquartered in Nicosia, Cyprus.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?