WallStSmart

Blue Owl Capital Inc (OWL)vsWells Fargo & Company (WFC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Wells Fargo & Company generates 2676% more annual revenue ($83.03B vs $2.99B). WFC leads profitability with a 27.2% profit margin vs 2.7%. OWL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.19. WFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).

OWL

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.0Value: 5.7Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.76

WFC

Strong Buy

76

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 5.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -0.38

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OWL2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.1910/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
28.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.9%

WFC6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$273.04B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
37.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 37.4%

Profit MarginProfitability
27.2%9/10

Keeps 27 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
13.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
25.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 25.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

OWL4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
4.0%3/10

ROE of 4.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.7%3/10

2.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
93.5x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

WFC3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.514/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.382/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
2.551/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OWL

The strongest argument for OWL centers on PEG Ratio, Operating Margin. PEG of 0.19 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WFC

The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 27.2% and operating margin at 37.4%.

Bear Case : OWL

The primary concerns for OWL are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 93.5x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 2.18 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : WFC

The primary concerns for WFC are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.55 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OWL profiles as a value stock while WFC is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

OWL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.21 — expect wider price swings.

WFC is growing revenue faster at 9.5% — sustainability is the question.

WFC generates stronger free cash flow (6.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WFC scores higher overall (76/100 vs 51/100), backed by strong 27.2% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Blue Owl Capital Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · ASSET MANAGEMENT · USA

Blue Owl Capital Inc. is an asset manager. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Wells Fargo & Company

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?