WallStSmart

Oshkosh Corporation (OSK)vsAdvanced Drainage Systems Inc (WMS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 229% more annual revenue ($10.61B vs $3.22B). WMS leads profitability with a 14.0% profit margin vs 5.2%. WMS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.28. WMS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B).

OSK

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.82

WMS

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.0Value: 4.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 2.39
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OSK.

WMSSignificantly Overvalued (-68.2%)

Margin of Safety

-68.2%

Fair Value

$102.98

Current Price

$126.05

$23.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $102.98Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OSK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.249/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WMS3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
22.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
26.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
20.6%8/10

Revenue surging 20.6% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-7.6%2/10

Earnings declined 7.6%

WMS1 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : WMS

The strongest argument for WMS centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 20.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.28 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : WMS

The primary concerns for WMS are Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OSK profiles as a value stock while WMS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WMS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.28 — expect wider price swings.

WMS is growing revenue faster at 20.6% — sustainability is the question.

OSK generates stronger free cash flow (349M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WMS scores higher overall (70/100 vs 50/100) and 20.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Advanced Drainage Systems Inc

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. designs, manufactures and markets thermoplastic corrugated pipe and related water management products and drainage solutions for use in the underground construction and infrastructure market in the United States, Canada, Mexico and internationally. The company is headquartered in Hilliard, Ohio.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?