WallStSmart

Oshkosh Corporation (OSK)vsWaste Management Inc (WM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Waste Management Inc generates 142% more annual revenue ($25.67B vs $10.61B). WM leads profitability with a 11.1% profit margin vs 5.2%. WM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.97. WM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

OSK

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.82

WM

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 3.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.54
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OSK.

WMSignificantly Overvalued (-87.6%)

Margin of Safety

-87.6%

Fair Value

$113.80

Current Price

$213.46

$99.66 premium

UndervaluedFair: $113.80Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OSK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.249/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WM3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$85.32B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
28.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.10B8/10

Generating 1.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-7.6%2/10

Earnings declined 7.6%

WM4 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.974/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
30.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
8.6x4/10

Trading at 8.6x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.0%4/10

4.0% revenue growth

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : WM

The strongest argument for WM centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : WM

The primary concerns for WM are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Debt-to-equity of 2.35 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

OSK is growing revenue faster at 6.7% — sustainability is the question.

WM generates stronger free cash flow (1.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WM scores higher overall (58/100 vs 50/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Waste Management Inc

INDUSTRIALS · WASTE MANAGEMENT · USA

Waste Management, Inc. is an American waste management, comprehensive waste, and environmental services company in North America. Founded in 1968, the company is headquartered 800 Capitol in Houston, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?