WallStSmart

Oshkosh Corporation (OSK)vsTwin Disc Incorporated (TWIN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 2683% more annual revenue ($10.61B vs $381.27M). TWIN leads profitability with a 7.1% profit margin vs 5.2%. TWIN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.16. TWIN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

OSK

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.82

TWIN

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 6.0Value: 6.7Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.93
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OSK.

TWINUndervalued (+34.7%)

Margin of Safety

+34.7%

Fair Value

$26.37

Current Price

$24.54

$1.83 discount

UndervaluedFair: $26.37Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OSK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.249/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TWIN5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
547.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 547.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.209/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
12.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.3%8/10

18.3% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-7.6%2/10

Earnings declined 7.6%

TWIN3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Market CapQuality
$343.98M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
7.1%3/10

7.1% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : TWIN

The strongest argument for TWIN centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 18.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : TWIN

The primary concerns for TWIN are Market Cap, Profit Margin, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OSK profiles as a value stock while TWIN is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

TWIN is growing revenue faster at 18.3% — sustainability is the question.

OSK generates stronger free cash flow (349M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TWIN scores higher overall (63/100 vs 50/100) and 18.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Twin Disc Incorporated

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Twin Disc, Incorporated designs, manufactures and sells power transmission equipment for off-highway and marine use worldwide. The company is headquartered in Racine, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?