WallStSmart

Oshkosh Corporation (OSK)vsTwin Disc Incorporated (TWIN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 2894% more annual revenue ($10.42B vs $348.10M). TWIN leads profitability with a 6.3% profit margin vs 6.2%. TWIN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.16. TWIN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C-).

OSK

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.82

TWIN

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 4.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

OSKUndervalued (+32.8%)

Margin of Safety

+32.8%

Fair Value

$259.60

Current Price

$147.37

$112.23 discount

UndervaluedFair: $259.60Overvalued
TWINUndervalued (+48.4%)

Margin of Safety

+48.4%

Fair Value

$33.40

Current Price

$16.52

$16.88 discount

UndervaluedFair: $33.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OSK2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
14.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TWIN3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
2239.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 2239.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.5%4/10

3.5% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TWIN4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.3%4/10

0.3% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$260.45M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
6.3%3/10

6.3% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.5%3/10

Operating margin of 1.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : TWIN

The strongest argument for TWIN centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TWIN

The primary concerns for TWIN are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.39 — expect wider price swings.

OSK is growing revenue faster at 3.5% — sustainability is the question.

OSK generates stronger free cash flow (526M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TWIN scores higher overall (55/100 vs 48/100). OSK offers better value entry with a 32.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Twin Disc Incorporated

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Twin Disc, Incorporated designs, manufactures and sells power transmission equipment for off-highway and marine use worldwide. The company is headquartered in Racine, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?