WallStSmart

Oshkosh Corporation (OSK)vsTwin Disc Incorporated (TWIN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 2768% more annual revenue ($10.43B vs $363.55M). TWIN leads profitability with a 7.3% profit margin vs 5.5%. TWIN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.16. TWIN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

OSK

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.82

TWIN

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.42
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for OSK.

TWINUndervalued (+32.2%)

Margin of Safety

+32.2%

Fair Value

$25.40

Current Price

$18.66

$6.74 discount

UndervaluedFair: $25.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OSK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.269/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
15.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TWIN4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
2239.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 2239.0% YoY

Revenue GrowthGrowth
19.0%8/10

19.0% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.2%4/10

0.2% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
5.5%3/10

5.5% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

Operating margin of 3.6%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

TWIN4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$288.75M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
7.3%3/10

7.3% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.162/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : TWIN

The strongest argument for TWIN centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 19.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : TWIN

The primary concerns for TWIN are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OSK profiles as a value stock while TWIN is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

TWIN is growing revenue faster at 19.0% — sustainability is the question.

TWIN generates stronger free cash flow (2M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TWIN scores higher overall (62/100 vs 49/100) and 19.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Twin Disc Incorporated

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Twin Disc, Incorporated designs, manufactures and sells power transmission equipment for off-highway and marine use worldwide. The company is headquartered in Racine, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?