Oshkosh Corporation (OSK)vsThomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares (TRI)
OSK
Oshkosh Corporation
$130.53
-1.95%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $8.42B
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares
$86.04
+0.35%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $35.94B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Oshkosh Corporation generates 36% more annual revenue ($10.43B vs $7.66B). TRI leads profitability with a 19.9% profit margin vs 5.5%. TRI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.29. TRI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).
OSK
Hold49
out of 100
Grade: D+
TRI
Buy59
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for OSK.
Margin of Safety
-53.2%
Fair Value
$58.22
Current Price
$86.04
$27.82 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 30.3%
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Areas to Watch
0.2% revenue growth
5.5% margin — thin
Operating margin of 3.6%
Weak financial health signals
No major concerns identified
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : OSK
The strongest argument for OSK centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.
Bull Case : TRI
The strongest argument for TRI centers on Operating Margin, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.9% and operating margin at 30.3%. PEG of 1.29 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : OSK
The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Operating Margin.
Bear Case : TRI
No major red flags identified for TRI, but monitor valuation.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
OSK profiles as a value stock while TRI is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.
TRI is growing revenue faster at 9.8% — sustainability is the question.
TRI generates stronger free cash flow (349M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
TRI scores higher overall (59/100 vs 49/100), backed by strong 19.9% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Oshkosh Corporation
INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA
Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.
Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares
INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA
Thomson Reuters Corporation provides business information services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific.
Compare with Other FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?