Oshkosh Corporation (OSK)vsTat Techno (TATT)
OSK
Oshkosh Corporation
$147.37
-1.52%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $9.23B
TATT
Tat Techno
$35.37
+1.46%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $452.59M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Oshkosh Corporation generates 5755% more annual revenue ($10.42B vs $178.01M). TATT leads profitability with a 9.4% profit margin vs 6.2%. TATT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.62. TATT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).
OSK
Hold48
out of 100
Grade: D+
TATT
Hold50
out of 100
Grade: D+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+32.8%
Fair Value
$259.60
Current Price
$147.37
$112.23 discount
Margin of Safety
-49.6%
Fair Value
$33.59
Current Price
$35.37
$1.78 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
3.5% revenue growth
6.2% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Moderate valuation
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Expensive relative to growth rate
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : OSK
The strongest argument for OSK centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.
Bull Case : TATT
The strongest argument for TATT centers on Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 13.4% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : OSK
The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : TATT
The primary concerns for TATT are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, PEG Ratio.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.39 — expect wider price swings.
TATT is growing revenue faster at 13.4% — sustainability is the question.
OSK generates stronger free cash flow (526M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
TATT scores higher overall (50/100 vs 48/100) and 13.4% revenue growth. OSK offers better value entry with a 32.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Oshkosh Corporation
INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA
Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.
Tat Techno
INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA
TAT Technologies Ltd., provides solutions and services to the commercial and military aerospace, and ground defense industries in the United States, Israel, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Gedera, Israel.
Visit Website →Compare with Other FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?