WallStSmart

Ooma Inc (OOMA)vsPalo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 3516% more annual revenue ($9.89B vs $273.60M). PANW leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs 2.4%. OOMA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.82. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

OOMA

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 5.3Quality: 5.0

PANW

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

OOMAUndervalued (+60.6%)

Margin of Safety

+60.6%

Fair Value

$28.82

Current Price

$16.32

$12.50 discount

UndervaluedFair: $28.82Overvalued
PANWUndervalued (+60.8%)

Margin of Safety

+60.8%

Fair Value

$457.02

Current Price

$179.32

$277.70 discount

UndervaluedFair: $457.02Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OOMA0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$145.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

OOMA4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.824/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$453.33M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
7.3%3/10

ROE of 7.3% — below average capital efficiency

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
13.4x4/10

Trading at 13.4x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.052/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
100.2x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OOMA

Revenue growth of 14.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : OOMA

The primary concerns for OOMA are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Market Cap. A P/E of 71.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.4% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 100.2x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OOMA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 14.9% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (470M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - APPLICATION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (56/100 vs 46/100) and 14.9% revenue growth. OOMA offers better value entry with a 60.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ooma Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Ooma, Inc. creates connected experiences for businesses and consumers in the United States, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?