WallStSmart

Ooma Inc (OOMA)vsPalo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 3561% more annual revenue ($10.61B vs $289.72M). PANW leads profitability with a 8.0% profit margin vs 3.2%. OOMA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.82. OOMA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

OOMA

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.83

PANW

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 3.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

OOMAUndervalued (+28.0%)

Margin of Safety

+28.0%

Fair Value

$15.76

Current Price

$21.88

$6.12 discount

UndervaluedFair: $15.76Overvalued
PANWUndervalued (+32.8%)

Margin of Safety

+32.8%

Fair Value

$467.52

Current Price

$319.00

$148.52 discount

UndervaluedFair: $467.52Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

OOMA1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
24.8%8/10

Revenue surging 24.8% year-over-year

PANW4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$273.25B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Revenue GrowthGrowth
31.1%10/10

Revenue surging 31.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

OOMA4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.824/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$550.05M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
3.2%3/10

3.2% margin — thin

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Price/BookValuation
9.4x4/10

Trading at 9.4x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
3.0%3/10

ROE of 3.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
8.0%3/10

8.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : OOMA

The strongest argument for OOMA centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 24.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 31.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : OOMA

The primary concerns for OOMA are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Market Cap. A P/E of 60.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Price/Book, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 294.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

OOMA profiles as a growth stock while PANW is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

OOMA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

PANW is growing revenue faster at 31.1% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (788M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OOMA scores higher overall (48/100 vs 47/100) and 24.8% revenue growth. PANW offers better value entry with a 32.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ooma Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Ooma, Inc. creates connected experiences for businesses and consumers in the United States, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?