WallStSmart

Nokia Corp ADR (NOK)vsUniversal Corporation (UVV)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nokia Corp ADR generates 587% more annual revenue ($20.00B vs $2.91B). NOK leads profitability with a 4.0% profit margin vs 2.9%. NOK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.15. UVV earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

NOK

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 5.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.65

UVV

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NOKUndervalued (+16.7%)

Margin of Safety

+16.7%

Fair Value

$8.81

Current Price

$12.35

$3.54 discount

UndervaluedFair: $8.81Overvalued
UVVUndervalued (+33.4%)

Margin of Safety

+33.4%

Fair Value

$79.32

Current Price

$53.70

$25.62 discount

UndervaluedFair: $79.32Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$74.25B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

UVV2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
15.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.654/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

UVV4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$1.34B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
7.0%3/10

ROE of 7.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.9%3/10

2.9% margin — thin

PEG RatioValuation
3.062/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.15 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : UVV

The strongest argument for UVV centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 83.1x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : UVV

The primary concerns for UVV are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NOK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.77 — expect wider price swings.

NOK is growing revenue faster at 2.4% — sustainability is the question.

NOK generates stronger free cash flow (629M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

UVV scores higher overall (45/100 vs 40/100). NOK offers better value entry with a 16.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Universal Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · TOBACCO · USA

Universal Corporation processes and supplies leaf tobacco and plant ingredients worldwide. The company is headquartered in Richmond, Virginia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?