WallStSmart

Nokia Corp ADR (NOK)vsTrade Desk Inc (TTD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nokia Corp ADR generates 590% more annual revenue ($20.00B vs $2.90B). TTD leads profitability with a 15.3% profit margin vs 4.0%. TTD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.92. TTD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

NOK

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 5.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.65

TTD

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 6.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.95
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

NOKUndervalued (+16.7%)

Margin of Safety

+16.7%

Fair Value

$8.81

Current Price

$12.35

$3.54 discount

UndervaluedFair: $8.81Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TTD.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$74.25B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TTD2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
30.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 30.3%

PEG RatioValuation
0.928/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.654/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

TTD3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.7x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.954/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.15 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TTD

The strongest argument for TTD centers on Operating Margin, PEG Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.3% and operating margin at 30.3%. Revenue growth of 14.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 83.1x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TTD

The primary concerns for TTD are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NOK profiles as a value stock while TTD is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

TTD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.10 — expect wider price swings.

TTD is growing revenue faster at 14.3% — sustainability is the question.

NOK generates stronger free cash flow (629M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TTD scores higher overall (72/100 vs 40/100), backed by strong 15.3% margins and 14.3% revenue growth. NOK offers better value entry with a 16.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Trade Desk Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Trade Desk, Inc. is a technology company in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Ventura, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?